The Lottery

Shirley Jackson's short story The Lottery was published in 1948 and it is not in the public domain.

Accordingly, we are prohibited from presenting the full text here in our short story collection, but here is a link to the full text of The Lottery on The New Yorker's website where you can also listen to an audio reading of the story before returning here for commentary and discussion, including an analysis of its themes and historical context. You can also listen an audiobook recording at the bottom of this page.


It is important to have some historical context to understand this story and the negative reaction that it generated when it appeared in the June 26, 1948 issue of The New Yorker. The setting for the story, a gathering in a small rural village, wasn't a fictional construct in America in the summer of 1948. The setting was emblematic of "small town America" and many people identified directly with the setting and the gathering depicted. It was customary at that time for rural community leaders to organize summertime gatherings to draw people together in town centers to socialize and to frequent and support some of the town's business establishments. It was thought to be good for the businesses and good for the community. These gatherings were usually organized by the city council and featured lotteries with modest cash-prizes to help lure people into their vehicles for the long drive to town. So the scene was instantly recognizable to readers -- especially rural readers -- when the story was published, and they did not like the way that this particular story developed and concluded. Many interpreted the story as an attack on the values of rural communities and "small town America." As a result, the story engendered an unanticipated avalanche of anger and criticism.

Here is a summary of the story, which will be followed by additional commentary.



On a warm summer day, villagers gather in a town square to participate in a lottery. The village is small with about 300 residents, and they are in an excited but anxious mood. We learn that this is an annual event and that some surrounding towns are thinking about abandoning the lottery. Mrs. (Tess) Hutchinson makes an undramatic entrance and chats briefly with Mrs. Delacroix, her friend.

The night before Mr. Summers, a town leader who officiates the lottery, had made paper slips listing all the families with the help of Mr. Graves (subtle name choice?). The slips were stored overnight in a safe at the coal company.

The villagers start to gather at 10 a.m. so that they may finish in time for lunch. Children busy themselves collecting stones -- one of those odd details that will later emerge loaded with meaning -- until the proceedings get underway and they are called together by their parents.

Mr. Summers works down the list of families, summoning the head man of each household. A male sixteen years or older comes forward and draws a slip of paper. When every family has a slip of paper, Mr. Summers has everyone look at the slip, and we discover that Bill Hutchinson has drawn the one slip with a black spot. It's his family that has been chosen. Mrs. Hutchinson begins to protest. With tension mounting, it becomes clear that "winning" this lottery isn't going to be what we expected, and that the "winner" isn't going to walk away with a pile of cash.

Once a family is chosen, the second round begins. In this round, each family member, no matter how old or young, must draw a slip of paper. It is Tess Hutchinson who draws the slip with the black circle. While Mrs. Hutchinson protests the unfairness of the situation, each of the villagers picks up a stone -- "And someone gave little Davy Hutchinson a few pebbles" -- and closes in on her. The story ends with Mrs. Hutchinson being stoned to death while protesting, "It isn't fair, it isn't right." The story concludes with six of the most famous closing words in short story history, "And then they were upon her."



When the story was released it engendered a very strong negative reaction and backlash that manifested itself in subscription cancellations for The New Yorker and large amounts of what could be described as "hate mail" for both the magazine and the author. Shirley Jackson and the editors at The New Yorker were both surprised by the reaction. Even Jackson's mother was critical of the work. Here is an excerpt from Jackson herself:

'It had simply never occurred to me that these millions and millions of people might be so far from being uplifted that they would sit down and write me letters I was downright scared to open; of the three-hundred-odd letters that I received that summer I can count only thirteen that spoke kindly to me, and they were mostly from friends. Even my mother scolded me: "Dad and I did not care at all for your story in The New Yorker," she wrote sternly; "it does seem, dear, that this gloomy kind of story is what all you young people think about these days. Why don't you write something to cheer people up?"'

One literary critic described the story as "a chilling tale of conformity gone mad." Yes, that's a nice sound-bite to release in a classroom discussion, a book club gathering or a short story seminar but I honestly doubt that the letters received by Jackson in 1948 cursed her for writing a tale of 'conformity gone mad.' I suspect that some people picked up and reacted strongly to the idea that Jackson might be suggesting that underneath the idyllic image of rural communities peopled by wholesome citizens, that there might be a sinister force waiting to be unleashed. The people in those communities certainly didn't see themselves that way. I suspect that some folks made simpler inferences about the story that they still found offensive. Personally, the story works for me at an allegorical level where the stones represent gossip, rumors, and innuendo, and the stoning itself represents the character assassination that can occur in small towns and communities. The lottery represents chance; at any point anyone of us can become the target of harmful gossip and rumors, even when they are unfounded. The encircling crowd represents the herding nature of people everywhere, and the vicious ways in which they can behave when they have formed a mob mentality.

Jackson kept her intended meaning to herself, believing that it would emerge more clearly with the passage of time. But considering that she was genuinely surprised by the reaction, it seems logical to conclude that she intended to make a commentary on general human nature rather than a specific criticism of rural American communities in the mid-20th century.

I think the questions of permission and participation make for a great discussion or essay about this particular short story. As small as the gathering is, it is an official event and an act of governance. The American writer and intellectual Henry David Thoreau suggested that you have a moral responsibility for your government; that when the government does something wrong -- say, handing out "free" small-pox infected blankets to Native American Indian tribes -- that it's not right to simply blame the government, because by extension that government belongs to you and acts on your behalf. So the blame belongs to you as well. That is part of the foundation for many of the ideas he advocates in his essay On Civil Disobedience.

In The Lottery, I see questions regarding the use of force: would you voluntarily participate in an annual lottery like this? Yet the people come every year. Why? I also see questions about permission and consent. Are people willing to tolerate the possibility of bad things happening in their community as long as the odds of it happening to them are low and the cost of speaking out and protesting against it might be high? What are we willing to trade-off or compromise to be part of a community? How do these questions relate to modern American culture and politics where some people -- an increasing number -- believe that some individual liberty should be sacrificed for the good of the community while others believe that individual liberty and the freedom to make personal choices is the highest consideration. That can be a difficult question for some, and they wish to answer it with a compromise: "Of course *some* individual liberty must be sacrificed." This story may be useful for removing the middle ground and raising guiding principles to the surface for consideration.


For those of you that have landed on this page looking for the secret to winning the lottery, I have a few thoughts . . .

First, good luck to you. I hope you win.

Second, there is no magic formula, and the odds of winning are extremely low. So balance your participation modestly, never spend more than you can afford. Enjoy dreaming about what you will do if you win.

Lastly, keep in mind, that no matter how often you play and lose, your worst loss is better than Tess Hutchinson's win!

Finally, here is an audiobook that will allow you to listen to the full text of The Lottery


The Lottery was featured as The Short Story of the Day on Wed, Jun 26, 2024

Frequently Asked Questions about The Lottery

What is "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson about?

The Lottery by Shirley Jackson is a short story set in a small American village where residents gather every June 27 for an annual lottery. The story follows the townspeople as they draw slips of paper from a worn black box, a ritual overseen by Mr. Summers. The Hutchinson family draws the marked slip, and in the second round, Tessie Hutchinson draws the paper with the black dot. In a shocking twist, the reader discovers that the "winner" of the lottery is stoned to death by the other villagers, including her own family members. The story ends with Tessie's desperate protest -- "It isn't fair, it isn't right" -- as the crowd closes in on her.

What is the main theme of "The Lottery"?

The central theme of The Lottery is the danger of blindly following tradition. The villagers continue the brutal ritual year after year despite having forgotten its original purpose. Shirley Jackson reveals that they "had forgotten the ritual" and no longer understand why they participate -- they simply do it because it has always been done. The story also explores mob mentality and conformity, showing how ordinary, friendly people can commit horrific violence when acting as a group. Even Old Man Warner, the oldest participant, dismisses neighboring towns that have abandoned the lottery, insisting that stopping it would be foolish. Jackson demonstrates that unquestioned obedience to tradition can override individual morality and basic human compassion.

What does the black box symbolize in "The Lottery"?

The black box in The Lottery is one of the story's most powerful symbols, representing tradition, death, and the villagers' reluctance to change. The box is old, splintered, and faded, yet the townspeople refuse to replace it -- just as they refuse to question the lottery itself. Its black color foreshadows death. The box is said to have been made from pieces of an even older box, connecting the present ritual to generations past, though no one can confirm this origin story. The villagers treat the box with a mixture of reverence and fear, keeping it stored at various locations throughout the year. Its shabby condition mirrors the decayed logic behind the tradition: the villagers cling to the ritual even though its original meaning has been lost.

Why do the villagers stone Tessie Hutchinson?

The villagers stone Tessie Hutchinson because she draws the slip of paper with the black dot, making her the lottery's "winner" -- and its sacrificial victim. The ritual appears rooted in an ancient superstition linking the sacrifice to a good harvest, as Old Man Warner references with the saying, "Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon." However, the villagers have forgotten the original purpose of the ceremony and participate purely out of habit and social pressure. No one steps forward to defend Tessie or question the practice, even though neighboring villages have abandoned the lottery. Tessie's protests -- "It isn't fair, it isn't right" -- go unheard, illustrating how groupthink and conformity can silence individual dissent and enable collective violence.

What literary devices does Shirley Jackson use in "The Lottery"?

Shirley Jackson employs several literary devices in The Lottery to build suspense and deliver her social critique. Foreshadowing appears early when children collect stones in their pockets -- an innocent detail that becomes horrifying in retrospect. Irony pervades the story: the sunny, pleasant setting contrasts sharply with the brutal ending, and the word "lottery" itself implies winning a prize rather than a death sentence. Jackson uses symbolism extensively -- the black box represents tradition, the stones represent communal violence, and character names carry meaning (Mr. Graves suggests death, Mr. Summers suggests the deceptive pleasantness of the event). The story's detached, matter-of-fact tone is itself a device, mirroring the villagers' casual acceptance of violence and making the ending all the more disturbing.

What is the significance of the names in "The Lottery"?

Shirley Jackson uses meaningful character names throughout The Lottery to reinforce the story's themes. Mr. Graves, who helps Mr. Summers prepare the lottery slips, has a name that directly evokes death and burial. Mr. Summers suggests warmth and pleasantness, masking the horror he oversees -- much like the bright summer day conceals the violence to come. Old Man Warner serves as a "warner" against change, stubbornly defending the tradition. Mr. Adams, who stands at the front of the crowd, shares a name with the biblical first man, Adam, suggesting humanity's capacity for original sin. Tessie Hutchinson may allude to Anne Hutchinson, the 17th-century Puritan woman who was persecuted and banished from the Massachusetts Bay Colony for challenging religious authority.

What was the public reaction when "The Lottery" was published?

When The Lottery was published in The New Yorker on June 26, 1948, it provoked one of the most intense reader reactions in the magazine's history. Hundreds of readers canceled their subscriptions, and both Shirley Jackson and the magazine received an avalanche of angry letters -- Jackson reported receiving over 300 letters that summer, with only thirteen that "spoke kindly." Even her own mother scolded her, writing: "Dad and I did not care at all for your story in The New Yorker." Many rural readers felt the story was an attack on small-town American values, as the setting closely resembled real community gatherings of the era. Jackson later explained that she had hoped "by setting a particularly brutal ancient rite in the present and in my own village, to shock the story's readers with a graphic dramatization of the pointless violence and general inhumanity in their own lives."

How does "The Lottery" relate to real-world events and history?

The Lottery was published in 1948, just three years after the end of World War II and the revelation of the Holocaust's full horrors. Shirley Jackson's depiction of ordinary citizens participating in ritualized murder resonated powerfully with the post-war understanding of how normal people can be complicit in atrocities. The story's theme of scapegoating -- selecting one person to bear the community's collective violence -- echoes historical patterns of persecution, from witch trials to ethnic cleansing. The concept connects to what philosopher Hannah Arendt later called "the banality of evil": the idea that horrific acts are often carried out not by monsters but by ordinary individuals who follow orders without moral questioning. The story also invites comparison with Henry David Thoreau's ideas in On Civil Disobedience, which argues that citizens bear moral responsibility for their government's actions.

What role does Old Man Warner play in "The Lottery"?

Old Man Warner is the oldest resident in the village and the most vocal defender of the lottery tradition. Having participated in seventy-seven lotteries, he represents the stubborn adherence to ritual that Shirley Jackson critiques throughout the story. When told that other villages are talking about giving up the lottery, Warner dismisses them as a "pack of crazy fools" and warns that abandoning the tradition will cause society to regress -- "Next thing you know, they'll be wanting to go back to living in caves." He also invokes the old saying, "Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon," linking the ritual to a superstitious belief in ensuring a good harvest. Warner's name is significant: he serves as a "warner" against change, yet ironically, it is his blind devotion to tradition that represents the story's greatest danger. He embodies the idea that longevity of a practice does not make it moral.

How does the ending of "The Lottery" create its impact?

The ending of The Lottery is one of the most famous shock endings in American literature. Throughout the story, Shirley Jackson deliberately withholds the true nature of the lottery, using a calm, journalistic tone that makes the village gathering seem routine and harmless. The revelation that the "winner" will be stoned to death arrives gradually -- first when Tessie Hutchinson begins to protest, then when the villagers pick up stones, and finally in the devastating closing line: "and then they were upon her." The ending works because Jackson has spent the entire story building a false sense of normalcy. Readers have been lulled by pleasant descriptions of sunshine, children playing, and neighbors chatting. This contrast between the mundane and the monstrous forces readers to confront an uncomfortable truth: that cruelty can hide beneath the surface of any community, and that ordinary people are capable of extraordinary violence when tradition and conformity go unquestioned.

Save stories, build your reading list, and access all study tools — completely free.

Save The Lottery to your library — it's free!

Need help with The Lottery?

Study tools to help with homework, prepare for quizzes, and deepen your understanding.

Flashcards → | Vocabulary → | Study Guide →